Table of Contents Hide
- Progressive Elaboration Vs. Rolling Wave Planning
- What is Progressive Elaboration?
- What is Rolling Wave Planning?
- Comparison Between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning
- Which Approach Should You Choose?
- Real-World Examples of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning
- Frequently Asked Questions
- What’s the Difference Between Progressive Elaboration And Rolling Wave Planning?
- What is Progressive Elaboration?
- What is Rolling Wave Planning?
- How are Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning related?
- Can you provide examples of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning?
- Is Progressive Elaboration similar to prototyping?
- How do the concepts of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning benefit project management teams?
Progressive elaboration involves continuously refining project details, while rolling wave planning adapts based on current project knowledge.
Progressive Elaboration Vs. Rolling Wave Planning
Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning are two project management techniques that involve iterative and adaptive approaches to project planning and execution. Here’s a breakdown of each technique:
Progressive Elaboration is a project management technique that recognizes the need for flexibility and continuous refinement throughout the project lifecycle. It involves initially defining project requirements and objectives in broad terms and then gradually adding more detail as the project progresses. Key points to understand about Progressive Elaboration include:
1. Iterative Approach: Progressive Elaboration follows an iterative approach, where project plans and deliverables are developed and refined in multiple cycles or iterations.
2. Flexibility: This technique allows for flexibility and adaptation to changes and uncertainties that may arise during the project. It acknowledges that not all details can be known upfront and that requirements and solutions may evolve over time.
3. Continuous Improvement: Progressive Elaboration emphasizes continuous improvement and learning throughout the project. It encourages stakeholders to provide feedback and make adjustments based on evolving understanding and changing circumstances.
4. Phased Approach: The project is divided into phases, with each phase building upon the previous one. As more information becomes available, subsequent phases are refined and developed with greater detail and accuracy.
Rolling Wave Planning:
Rolling Wave Planning is a technique that focuses on planning and executing projects in smaller, manageable chunks. It involves developing detailed plans for the immediate future while keeping plans for the later stages at a higher level. Key points to understand about Rolling Wave Planning include:
1. Phased Planning: Rolling Wave Planning divides the project into distinct phases, with the initial phases planned in detail and the later phases planned at a higher level.
2. Adaptability: This technique allows project teams to adjust plans and incorporate new information as they progress through the project. Detailed planning for future phases occurs as the project unfolds and more information becomes available.
3. Risk Management: Rolling Wave Planning enables the identification and management of project risks early on. By focusing on detailed planning for the near term, potential risks and uncertainties can be addressed proactively.
4. Efficiency: By not investing excessive time and effort in planning for distant future phases, Rolling Wave Planning allows project teams to focus resources on executing the immediate tasks effectively.
It’s important to note that Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they can complement each other, with Progressive Elaboration providing the overall framework for iterative development and Rolling Wave Planning aiding in the detailed planning of specific project phases. Both techniques contribute to a more flexible and adaptive approach to project management, enabling teams to navigate uncertainties and deliver successful outcomes.
What is Progressive Elaboration?
Progressive elaboration refers to the iterative process of gradually refining project requirements and deliverables as more information becomes available. It involves continuously adding detail and depth to the project plan throughout its lifecycle. This approach allows for flexibility, adaptation, and continuous improvement based on evolving project needs and stakeholders’ feedback.
Definition and Explanation of Progressive Elaboration
The definition and explanation of progressive elaboration showcase that it is an effective project management approach that involves continuously refining and expanding project details as more information becomes available. It focuses on the gradual development and refinement of project plans over time. By adopting this approach, project teams can make informed decisions based on the most up-to-date information.
In progressive elaboration, the project starts with high-level plans and gradually adds more details as the project progresses. It allows for flexibility and adaptability, as new information can be incorporated into the project plan as it becomes available. This iterative process ensures that the project remains aligned with the client’s needs and objectives.
The key benefit of progressive elaboration is that it minimizes the risk of making incorrect assumptions early on in the project. By continuously gathering and evaluating information, project teams can make more accurate plans and forecasts, which can help in managing potential risks. This approach also allows for the identification of unforeseen challenges and provides the opportunity to adjust the project plan accordingly.
The definition and explanation of progressive elaboration show that it is an effective project management approach that promotes flexibility, adaptability, and accurate planning. By embracing this technique, project teams can enhance project outcomes and increase the chances of delivering successful projects.
To effectively implement progressive elaboration, project teams should regularly communicate and collaborate, maintain transparency, and prioritize continuous improvement to achieve project success.
Key Features and Benefits of Progressive Elaboration
- Key Features and Benefits of Progressive Elaboration:
- Increased collaboration: Progressive elaboration encourages collaboration among team members as it involves regular communication and feedback loops. This leads to a better understanding of project requirements and greater alignment among team members.
- Iterative approach: With progressive elaboration, projects are broken down into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. This allows for continuous improvement and adaptation based on feedback and changing requirements.
- Flexibility: Progressive elaboration promotes flexibility in project planning and execution. It allows for adjustments to be made as new information and insights emerge during the project lifecycle.
- Improved stakeholder engagement: By involving stakeholders early and continuously throughout the project, progressive elaboration ensures their needs and expectations are considered and incorporated into the final deliverables.
- Reduced risk: By breaking down projects into smaller increments, progressive elaboration enables early identification and mitigation of potential risks. This helps in controlling and managing risks effectively throughout the project.
What is Rolling Wave Planning?
Rolling Wave Planning is a dynamic project management approach that keeps the future in focus while adjusting plans in response to real-time information.
Rolling wave planning involves breaking down the project into short-term phases or waves, where only the immediate phase is planned in detail. The subsequent phases are planned based on the knowledge and insights gained from the previous phases. This approach allows for flexibility and adjustment as the project progresses, accommodating changes and optimizing resource allocation.
Definition and Explanation of Rolling Wave Planning
Rolling Wave Planning, also referred to as iterative project management, is a dynamic project management technique. It involves planning and executing a project in cycles, with each cycle providing a clearer understanding of the project’s scope and details. This flexible approach allows for adjustments and refinements as knowledge is gained during each cycle.
The main idea behind Rolling Wave Planning is to strike a balance between detailed planning and the need for flexibility. The initial planning is done in detail for the current cycle, while future cycles are planned at a higher level. As the project progresses, more detailed planning takes place for subsequent cycles. This approach ensures efficient resource allocation and adaptability to changing circumstances.
One of the key benefits of Rolling Wave Planning is its ability to manage uncertainty and reduce risks. As the project moves forward, new information becomes available, allowing the team to proactively identify potential risks and address them. By continuously monitoring and evaluating the project’s progress, informed decisions can be made, and corrective actions can be taken when necessary.
Key Features and Benefits of Rolling Wave Planning
- Key Features and Benefits of Rolling Wave Planning include adaptability, incremental delivery, enhanced stakeholder engagement, risk management, and improved resource allocation. Rolling Wave Planning recognizes that not all project details can be known upfront, allowing for flexibility and adjustments as the project progresses. It focuses on delivering the project in increments or waves, allowing for early delivery of some parts while refining subsequent waves. The approach encourages collaboration and involvement of stakeholders throughout the project, ensuring their needs are met. The iterative nature of Rolling Wave Planning enables continuous monitoring and mitigation of risks, reducing their impact on the project’s success. Resource allocation can be more efficiently managed based on priority and the specific requirements of each wave, optimizing resource utilization.
Using Rolling Wave Planning, project managers can adapt to changing circumstances, deliver value incrementally, actively engage stakeholders, manage risks effectively, and optimize resource allocation to ensure project success.
Fact: Rolling Wave Planning is often used in agile project management methodologies such as Scrum and Kanban to foster collaboration and enhance project outcomes.
Comparison Between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning
- Scope and Detail:
- Flexibility and Adaptability
- Planning Horizon
- Resource Allocation
Scope and Detail
|Progressive Elaboration||Rolling Wave Planning|
|Progressive Elaboration involves starting with a high-level plan and gradually adding more detail as the project progresses.||Rolling Wave Planning involves developing a detailed plan for the initial phase of a project and progressively refining the plan for subsequent phases.|
|This approach allows for flexibility and adaptability, as the detailed planning is done closer to the implementation stage.||This approach provides a more detailed plan upfront for better project control and resource allocation.|
|The scope and detail of the plan may evolve and change over time as more information becomes available.||The scope and detail of the plan for each phase are determined and documented early on, with less room for changes.|
|Progressive Elaboration focuses on optimizing the level of detail based on project needs and available information.||Rolling Wave Planning emphasizes a more comprehensive and specific plan to guide the project from the beginning.|
|This approach allows for better risk management by addressing uncertainties as they arise during the project.||This approach provides a more structured and controlled approach to risk management through upfront planning.|
When considering the scope and detail of project planning, Progressive Elaboration offers more flexibility and adaptability, allowing for adjustments based on evolving information and needs. On the other hand, Rolling Wave Planning provides a more comprehensive and detailed plan upfront, ensuring better control and resource allocation. The choice between the two approaches depends on the specific project requirements, available information, and the level of detail and control desired.
Flexibility and Adaptability
Flexibility and adaptability are crucial aspects when considering the approach of progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning.
In progressive elaboration, flexibility allows for adjustments to be made throughout the project lifespan. It enables teams to respond to changing requirements and incorporate new information. This flexibility is essential in dynamic industries where market conditions are constantly evolving.
Similarly, adaptability is a key feature of rolling wave planning. It allows for adjustments to be made based on the ongoing feedback and learning from previous iterations. This approach enables teams to adapt their plans to fit the evolving needs of the project, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively.
Both progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning require a flexible and adaptable mindset. They acknowledge that projects are not static and that adjustments may be necessary to achieve success. By embracing flexibility and adaptability, teams can better respond to challenges, seize opportunities, and effectively manage risks throughout the project lifecycle.
Ultimately, the choice between progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning depends on the specific context and requirements of the project. The level of flexibility and adaptability needed may vary, and it is important to consider the unique characteristics and constraints of each approach.
A planning horizon, in the context of project management and planning, refers to the time period during which a project or plan is expected to be executed or implemented. It is crucial in determining the scope and duration of the planning process, as well as in establishing milestones and deadlines. When considering the planning horizon, it is essential to consider both short-term and long-term goals and objectives.
To better comprehend the concept of a planning horizon, let’s examine an example within the context of a construction project. Let’s say a company intends to construct a new office building. The planning horizon for this particular project might extend over several years, commencing from the initial design phase and culminating in the completion of the construction process. Throughout this duration, it is necessary to carry out various activities, including obtaining permits, conducting feasibility studies, hiring contractors, and procuring materials.
One method to present the planning horizon for the construction project is by using a table as shown below:
|Project Phase||Start Date||End Date|
|Design||Jan 2023||Mar 2023|
|Permitting||Apr 2023||Jun 2023|
|Construction||Jul 2023||Dec 2024|
|Interior Design||Jan 2025||Mar 2025|
|Furnishing||Apr 2025||Jun 2025|
|Move-in||Jul 2025||Aug 2025|
As depicted in the table, the planning horizon for the construction project encompasses the period from January 2023 to August 2025. This timeline offers a comprehensive overview of the different project phases, along with their respective start and end dates.
The planning horizon assumes a vital role in establishing the timeline for project execution. It ensures that all essential activities are accomplished within the designated timeframe, facilitating effective project management and successful project completion.
To comprehend the significance of resource allocation in project management, let’s examine a table that compares the resource allocation strategies for Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning:
|Progressive Elaboration||Rolling Wave Planning|
|Approach||Iterative and incremental||Proactive|
|Resource||Allocated as needed||Allocated in advance|
|Planning||Only for current phase||Entire project duration|
|Risk||Minimized in early phases||Higher in later stages|
In the case of Progressive Elaboration, resource allocation is carried out as required throughout the project. This approach allows for high flexibility as resources are allocated based on the specific requirements of each phase. Effort is gradually increased as the project progresses, and risks are minimized in the early stages.
On the contrary, Rolling Wave Planning involves pre-allocating resources for the entire project duration. This approach provides less flexibility as resources are allocated upfront based on the initial project plan. Effort tends to be front-loaded, with more resources allocated in the early stages. Risks are higher in later stages as accommodating changes may be more challenging.
When choosing between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning, consider the required level of flexibility, the project’s nature, and the availability of resources. Progressive Elaboration is suitable for projects with evolving requirements and a need for adaptability, while Rolling Wave Planning works well for projects with well-defined scope and stable requirements.
In summary, resource allocation is a critical aspect of project management. The decision between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning relies on the project’s specific needs and objectives. Proper resource allocation ensures that adequate resources are allocated at the appropriate time, leading to the successful completion of the project.
Risk management is an essential aspect of both progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning. It helps to identify potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate or address them.
- Identify risks: During the planning phase, it is important to identify all potential risks that could impact the project. These risks can include financial risks, technical risks, operational risks, or external risks.
- Assess risks: Once the risks are identified, they should be assessed to determine their potential impact on the project. This involves evaluating the likelihood of the risk occurring and the severity of its impact.
- Develop risk management strategies: Based on the assessment, appropriate risk management strategies should be developed. This may include avoiding the risk, transferring the risk, mitigating the risk, or accepting the risk.
- Implement risk management measures: The identified risk management strategies should be implemented to reduce the likelihood or impact of the risks. This may involve implementing contingency plans, allocating additional resources, or implementing monitoring and control measures.
- Monitor and review risks: Throughout the project, risks should be continually monitored and reviewed to ensure that the risk management strategies are effective. Adjustments should be made as necessary to address any new or changing risks.
Which Approach Should You Choose?
Choosing between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning depends on various factors:
- Project Complexity: Progressive Elaboration is more suitable for complex projects where requirements evolve over time. Rolling Wave Planning works well for projects with relatively stable requirements.
- Flexibility: If your project requires flexibility and adaptability to changing circumstances, Progressive Elaboration is a better choice. Rolling Wave Planning provides less flexibility as it follows a more structured and predefined approach.
- Time Constraints: If your project has strict time constraints, Rolling Wave Planning may be more appropriate. It allows for detailed planning in the early stages, which can help meet deadlines. Progressive Elaboration, on the other hand, focuses on iterative development and may require more time for frequent adjustments.
- Level of Detail: Progressive Elaboration emphasizes working with limited information initially and gradually gathering more details as the project progresses. If you have limited information at the start and can tolerate uncertainty, this approach can be effective. Rolling Wave Planning, on the other hand, requires a higher level of initial detail and planning.
- Stakeholder Involvement: If stakeholder involvement and feedback are critical to project success, Progressive Elaboration is recommended. It allows for continuous collaboration and incorporates feedback throughout the project lifecycle. Rolling Wave Planning may have less stakeholder involvement as it follows a more linear planning process.
Ultimately, the choice between Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning depends on the unique characteristics of your project and the specific needs and constraints you face. Consider factors such as project complexity, flexibility, time constraints, level of detail, and stakeholder involvement to make an informed decision that aligns with your project goals.
Real-World Examples of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning
Real-world examples of progressive elaboration and rolling wave planning demonstrate how these project management techniques are applied:
- Progressive Elaboration: Consider a software development project where the requirements are not fully known at the beginning. The project team starts with an initial set of high-level requirements and begins development. As the project progresses, more detailed requirements are identified, and the team incorporates them into the project plan. This iterative process allows for flexibility and adaptation as new information becomes available, resulting in a more refined and accurate final product.
- Rolling Wave Planning: Imagine a construction project to build a new office building. Instead of planning every detail of the entire project upfront, the project team adopts rolling wave planning. They start by creating a high-level plan for the entire project, focusing on the immediate phases. As each phase progresses, more detailed planning takes place for the subsequent phases. This approach allows the team to incorporate lessons learned, adapt to changing requirements, and make more informed decisions as the project unfolds.
- Progressive Elaboration: In a marketing campaign, a team decides to launch a new product. They start with a basic marketing plan, outlining the target audience, key messages, and initial channels. As the campaign progresses and market feedback is received, the team gathers more information about customer preferences, competitive landscape, and effective marketing tactics. They use this information to refine and expand the marketing plan, adjusting their strategy to maximize impact and achieve better results.
- Rolling Wave Planning: In event planning, an organizing committee is tasked with hosting a conference. They begin by creating a high-level schedule, determining the main sessions and speakers. As the event approaches, they dive into more detailed planning for each session, including selecting specific topics, securing additional speakers, and coordinating logistics. This approach allows the committee to adapt to any last-minute changes, incorporate attendee feedback, and ensure a successful and well-executed conference.
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the Difference Between Progressive Elaboration And Rolling Wave Planning?
Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning are two concepts in project management that are often confused. Let’s explore the differences between them:
What is Progressive Elaboration?
Progressive Elaboration is an iterative planning process where the project plan becomes more detailed as more specific information and accurate estimates become available. It allows for continuously improving and detailing a plan based on the evolving project requirements.
What is Rolling Wave Planning?
Rolling Wave Planning is a technique where detailed planning is done for activities in the near term, while high-level planning is done for activities in the future. As the project progresses and requirements become clearer, more detailed planning is done for work packages at lower levels of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
How are Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning related?
Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning are two forms of the same concept. Rolling Wave Planning is a specific application of Progressive Elaboration in project management, where detailed planning is done for near-term activities and high-level planning is done for future activities.
Can you provide examples of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning?
Sure! Let’s consider an example of planning a vacation to India. Initially, a high-level plan is created with specific dates and flight bookings. As the trip progresses and more specific information is gathered, the plan is continuously improved and detailed, including specific places to visit, transportation, accommodation, and activities. This represents the iterative nature of Progressive Elaboration. Rolling Wave Planning can be compared to booking flight tickets and hotel rooms in advance while leaving the detailed itinerary and sightseeing planning for later stages of the trip.
Is Progressive Elaboration similar to prototyping?
While Progressive Elaboration and prototyping share similarities, they are not the same. Progressive Elaboration focuses on continuously improving and detailing the project plan as more information becomes available. Prototyping, on the other hand, involves creating tangible working models or mock-ups of the expected product to obtain early feedback and identify potential issues before moving forward with the project.
How do the concepts of Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning benefit project management teams?
Progressive Elaboration and Rolling Wave Planning ensure that project management teams can adapt and plan more accurately as the project progresses. They allow for greater detail in project planning, help prevent delays by providing more specific information, and enable early identification of potential issues. These concepts are vital for successful project schedule management and are incorporated into the PMBOK Guide 6th Edition, making them important for PMP aspirants to understand.
Featured Image By – Freepik
Image 1 By –
Image 2 By –